From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9KMdFd6013615 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:39:16 -0700 Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5FE281311352 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail01.adl6.internode.on.net [203.16.214.146]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3yuJ7aIHh46bcAqB for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:35:49 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) Message-ID: <20081020223549.GA21152@disturbed> References: <20081017164116.GA17375@infradead.org> <20081017165738.GA20818@infradead.org> <20081017203710.GA27187@infradead.org> <20081017135510.7127c4e7@infradead.org> <20081020163327.GA15651@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Arjan van de Ven , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:13:05PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > 2008/10/20 Christoph Hellwig : > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:58:09PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > >> Hi Christoph > >> > >> I have the same result with next-1020 and today's xfs-2.6.git/master > >> ( > >> commit bfd2bd10da76378dc4afd87d7d204a1d3d70b347 > >> Author: David Chinner > >> Date: Fri Oct 17 15:36:23 2008 +1000 > >> Inode: Allow external list initialisation > >> ) > Ha, that kernel (xfs/master) has made my system dead locked. > SysRQ-d: > Show all locks held in the system > 1 lock held by pdflush > (&type->s_umount_key#18{----}, at writeback_inodes > 1 lock held by login > (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----} at xfs_ilock > and so on ( many locks at xfs_ilock) Curious. Can you post the full stack traces? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com