From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9Q8dhqr031573 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:39:43 -0700 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EB8DDEB0FB7 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sF3RPAETr7wCVCWC for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:39:39 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: left over things in linux-next after 2.6.28-c1 Message-ID: <20081026083939.GA19394@infradead.org> References: <20081026005009.50dbbb33.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081026081717.GB20872@infradead.org> <20081026193421.f5f7d8f1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081026193421.f5f7d8f1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:34:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Presumably what was merged was slightly different (or the commits were > split up differently). This is the same problem I have with the kvm tree. It should be the same, but the xfs trees have been a bit of a maze recently, so it shouldn't be a surprise that your list got out of sync.