From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9SEwwn2032588 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:58:58 -0700 Received: from rproxy.teamix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 91724149AB7A for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rproxy.teamix.net (postman.teamix.net [194.150.191.120]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zST0zTgQ7ExGkXig for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nb27steigerwald.qs.de (unknown [212.204.70.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rproxy.teamix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B07DCA for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:58:52 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: Debian Etch Backport of xfsprogs 2.9.8-1 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:58:51 +0100 References: <200810281446.45521.ms@teamix.de> (sfid-20081028_144836_639822_756F01B9) In-Reply-To: <200810281446.45521.ms@teamix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810281558.51613.ms@teamix.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Am Tuesday 28 October 2008 14:46:34 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Hi! > > I made a xfsprogs-Backports for Debian Etch, since the xfsprogs for Etch is > at version 2.8.11 - so fairly outdated: Something in the SGI mail infrastructure appears to break the GPG signature. It appears fine on backports-users mailing list. -- Martin Steigerwald - team(ix) GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90