From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAQ3UrTZ002980 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:30:54 -0600 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:30:53 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20081126033053.GD19523@infradead.org> References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> <492C7160.80208@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <492C7160.80208@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Goodwin Cc: Russell Cattelan , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:42:56AM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: > Why? Is it just a bandwidth issue with the initial clone, or some > other reason? It's just a lot more confusing. E.g. you can't diretly clone a branch, it alwasys needs at least two commands. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs