From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: truncated files
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:59:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126225931.GK6291@disturbed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811260949.19642.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:49:18AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag 25 November 2008 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:44:14PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Today on one try to hibernate via tuxonice it machine appeared dead.
> > > I am
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> > When (not if) suspend to disk/resume fails, you get to keep all the
> > broken pieces of your filesystem. It works most of the time, but it has
> > some fundamentally broken corner cases that you probably just
> > hit....
>
> Well I use TuxOnIce for a reason! I had uptimes of up to 70 days with it
> already. And they are usually only interrupted by kernel updates or
> manual shutdowns. I was never convinced by in-kernel solutions for
> hibernate.
Sure, though I'm not convinced that TuxOnIce is any better because
it still uses the same fundamental design as the in-kernel ones.
> > I've never had a system that suspends reliably (let alone resumes
> > from the suspend) so it's no real surprise that I don't trust
> > suspend to disk....
>
> Well I take it as bad luck then, especially since there are no hints that
> XFS had a problem. I am not sure whether the machine really was dead, but
> I can't reproduce what exactly happened. So thats it.
And therein lies the problem. I can't get suspend/resume to work
reliably on anything I own, so I can't do anything about problems
reported as a result of suspend/resume. Hell, I even considered
running linux on my new laptop inside a virtual machine on windows
just so I could have functioning suspend/resume....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 21:44 truncated files Martin Steigerwald
2008-11-25 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2008-11-26 8:49 ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-11-26 22:59 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2008-11-28 22:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-11-28 22:39 ` Martin Steigerwald
2008-11-29 7:24 ` hangs with MTRR_SANITIZER? (was: Re: truncated files) Martin Steigerwald
2008-11-29 23:02 ` hangs with MTRR_SANITIZER? - no, something else Martin Steigerwald
2008-12-08 8:40 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] hangs with MTRR_SANITIZER? - solved Martin Steigerwald
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-25 22:03 truncated files Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126225931.GK6291@disturbed \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox