From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB3AqjFc010927 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:52:45 -0600 Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:52:44 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 11/22] cleanup xfs_sb.h feature flag helpers Message-ID: <20081203105244.GI15485@infradead.org> References: <20081202160430.775774000@bombadil.infradead.org> <20081202160651.115809000@bombadil.infradead.org> <49362688.4030200@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49362688.4030200@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Donald Douwsma Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:26:16PM +1100, Donald Douwsma wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks ok, I think all these used to be macros, but when they got cleaned up > a lot of grogens were left in place. I wish we could get all this kind of thing > cleaned up right first time... I think this was Nathan's big sweap to kill xfs_macros.[ch] for the ugly marcros turning into macros calling functions calling the original macro crap. He did this in some sort of scripted way and a lot of things like this were left in place. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs