From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB40EB7s002753 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:14:11 -0600 Received: from estes.americas.sgi.com (estes.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.10]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE45AC011 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:14:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:19:40 -0600 From: "Bill O'Donnell" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CRC support for superblock, ag headers, log and btree blocks Message-ID: <20081204001940.GB2804@sgi.com> References: <20080925225613.GA9822@lst.de> <20081201231005.GA17631@sgi.com> <20081203104409.GA15485@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081203104409.GA15485@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@sgi.com On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 05:44:09AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: | On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:10:05PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote: | > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:56:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: | > | Here's an updated crc series for various metadata structures. We're still | > | looking at the magic number in the log recovery case because getting down | > | a buffer type for the other structures wasn't quite as easy as for the | > | btree block. I'll probably look into that again once we're done with all | > | data structures. | > | > Just to be clear, crc only applies to the metadata structures listed in the | > subject line, correct? It wasn't clear to me where you were with the "other | > structures". Maybe it would be more clear if you could provide a simple | > table listing the structures and whether or not crc applies (yet). | | The patchset sent applies to | | sb | agi | agf | btree_block | log buffer | | next patchset later this week will add the inode OK, thanks Christoph- I'll look for it later in the week. BTW, there seems to be some aliasing issue with xfs-oss list at least with my mailer. I dunno, but its converting xfs@oss.sgi.com into xfs@sgi.com. The upshot is that although you cc'd the list in your replies to my posts, those replies aren't getting posted. Cheers- Bill _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs