From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB4CoD4G029040 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:50:15 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:50:06 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) Message-ID: <20081204125006.GA13411@infradead.org> References: <20081203183602.c06f8c39.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081204121330.GA18815@infradead.org> <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Eric Sandeen , LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Christoph Hellwig On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:46:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:365: error: 'xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl' undeclared here (not in a function) > > Eric mentioned that your patch "had a problem of its own", so I assumed > that was it and left it removed from today's linux-next. Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git tree. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs