From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB4DQk70032418 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:26:46 -0600 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:26:45 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20081204132645.GA32664@infradead.org> References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C9FB9.3090204@sgi.com> <20081126020009.GF6291@disturbed> <492CC287.3070709@sgi.com> <20081126040840.GG6291@disturbed> <492CE189.2000304@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <492CE189.2000304@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:41:29PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > I was just thinking that if an external developer is working on a clone of > say the master branch and they have a fix, that they might post a patch > and say where sgi can pull from (the developer's tree) to receive the patch(es) > as an easier way to bring stuff in. So do you want git trees or not now? I spent quite some time to set up a tree for my last set of patches, but what got in was slightly different, so when I pulles I got a merge and duplicates in my tree and had to git-reset to a point before my patches. If you do apply from the list anyway I can avoid that overhead. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs