From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB4HrGMK021890 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:16 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 918C31697A41 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:53:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7vMTs5HRHgMrAmLf for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:53:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:53:07 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Device loses barrier support (was: Fixed patch for simple barriers.) Message-ID: <20081204175306.GA24196@infradead.org> References: <20081204100050.GN6703@one.firstfloor.org> <20081204142015.GQ6703@one.firstfloor.org> <20081204145810.GR6703@one.firstfloor.org> <20081204174838.GS6703@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081204174838.GS6703@one.firstfloor.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Mikulas Patocka , Alasdair G Kergon , Milan Broz On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:48:38PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > I think. Just the low level xfs_buf interface happens to use the asynchronous > callbacks instead of calling into the block layer directly like jbd et.al. > do. Only delwri buffers are delayed in XFS, but the journaling code only uses async buffers which *synchronously* call into the block layer, but just don't wait for it to complete.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs