From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB99nXlc013127 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 03:49:33 -0600 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:49:32 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: What's left for 2.6.29? Message-ID: <20081209094932.GA21925@infradead.org> References: <493DE01B.6050303@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493DE01B.6050303@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Goodwin Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:03:55PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: > > I think we need to freeze and start testing, i.e. git-cherry from > the master branch over to for-linus and start some soak, stress > amd regression testing. What's still left? Outstanding reviews? I've resent my current 2.6.29 queue. > Dave, ...? Dave, a while ago you mentioned you still had some sort of check in xfs_iread pending from the new inode cache, but I don't remember the details. Maybe you could find and submit that one again? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs