From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB9A8Kje014319 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:08:20 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 30357277A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sOsx33m1Nrf0pRaQ for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:08:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:07:48 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Patch queue for 2.6.29 Message-ID: <20081209100748.GA25897@infradead.org> References: <20081209094729.939583000@bombadil.infradead.org> <200812091057.49292.Martin@lichtvoll.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812091057.49292.Martin@lichtvoll.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2008 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > > These are my outstanding patches for 2.6.29. The first two have > > already been rewied by Dave, the others still need review. > > Patch 4/5 appears to be missing. It's now there for me, unfortunately the oss has some rather non-deterministic delays.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs