From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB9GvTWi002861 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:57:30 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4B09F4385 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id D03fjpMx10tfZMlS for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:57:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:57:28 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20081209165728.GA18536@infradead.org> References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> <492CA07F.1030803@sgi.com> <492CC201.3080304@xfs.org> <20081209091725.GA26180@infradead.org> <493E9AB4.1050505@xfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493E9AB4.1050505@xfs.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Russell Cattelan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:20:04AM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote: > The problem is that you have a tracking branch for xfs-dev so git wants > to leave your branch untouched > until you actually want to update it from the remote branch origin/xfs-dev > What you can do is: > % git-fetch > % git-pull . xfs-dev > > That will pull the latest xfs-dev stuff into your current branch. It might. But remember more than a single command to update a repository is just a braindead design. Especially if I have to remember a branch name. Even CVS got this right.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs