From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBA6pj6k021611 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:51:49 -0600 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:51:44 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: New XFS git tree on oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20081210065143.GA5834@infradead.org> References: <492BA7AD.5080007@sgi.com> <20081125081644.GA20644@infradead.org> <492C0B3D.3040002@thebarn.com> <492CA07F.1030803@sgi.com> <492CC201.3080304@xfs.org> <20081209091725.GA26180@infradead.org> <493E9AB4.1050505@xfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Niv Sardi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Russell Cattelan , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:20:05AM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > Please read git documentation. > > You don't want to be pulling xfs-dev into a xfs/master tree, you should > setup a remote properly and have local branch tracking them. Sorry, I'm not gona waste my time on this shit. It works just fine with a separate git repository that has zero downsides. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs