From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBCM2oQO018449 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:02:52 -0600 Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2F34A1726F for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DHpIFmBQ3lPL5FSC for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:02:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:02:44 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs: possible circular locking dependency detected Message-ID: <20081212220243.GB22525@disturbed> References: <20081206132023.GA21235@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081206132023.GA21235@localhost> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Ingo Molnar , David Chinner , LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:20:24PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I got this warning while accessing xfs on usb storage. > Is this a real problem? False positive. I haven't had time to add and test the lockdep annotation Peter created last week to allow us to avoid this, but hopefully that will make it go away. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs