From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBMJapR9020925 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:36:51 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6FB7E3FDF8 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VimQGH5YMVds83Cr for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:36:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:58:50 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: xfstests testcase 111: Infinite xfs_bulkstat bad-inode loop case from Roger Willcocks Message-ID: <20081222165848.GA17075@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Roger Willcocks Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Roger, I believe the xfstests case 111 is based on a report by you. Do you remember what was going on there? From a look at the testcase it overwrites an inode cluster and then tries to bulkstat them. This works fine with a non-debug kernel, but due to debug kernels panicing it fails there. Do you remember what the testcase was looking for? I suspect we should just not run it for debug kernels, but I'd like to know more about it so we can add comments describing it. Cheers, Christoph _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs