Re: xfs_db 2.9.8: coredump

[Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>]

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:52:10PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>> # xfs_db -V
> >>> xfs_db version 2.9.8
> >>> 
> >>> p34:~# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/sda1
> >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >>> p34:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1
> >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >>> 
> >>> (It was working BEFORE I ran xfs_fsr on it, it was at 16% fragmentation).
> >>> 
> >>> Now it can no longer check it?

xfs_db works on the block device under the filesystem, not the
filesystem. Also, the block device on linux caches blocks, so
after running xfs_fsr the filesystem layout has changed but the
underlying block device now has a stale cache. hence xfs_db is
probably being pointed off into la-la land by the stale block
device cache.

# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

Is your friend whenever you want to use xfs_db on a mounted
filesystem.

> p34:~# umount /r1
> p34:~# sync

And now the block device is coherent....

> p34:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1
> actual 365758, ideal 358711, fragmentation factor 1.93%

> p34:~# mount -a
> p34:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1
> actual 365758, ideal 358711, fragmentation factor 1.93%
> p34:~# mount -a ; dmesg | tail -n 2
> p34:~# xfs_fsr /dev/sda1
> /r1 start inode=0
> p34:~# xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/sda1
> actual 365751, ideal 358711, fragmentation factor 1.92%
> p34:~#

And this resulted in very little change  so the block device
cache wasn't completely wacked....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs