From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mBVAWgCY022999 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:32:43 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9C235179A80F for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:32:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PtC8MfHCLzKJv2Xe for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:32:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:21:16 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs userspace status Message-ID: <20081231092116.GA16552@infradead.org> References: <200812310242.08183.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812310242.08183.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:42:06AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > sorry, i dont keep abreast of xfs things beyond packaging in Gentoo. is > upstream moving out of SGI or something ? Upstream is still SGI, but we're playing akpm to collect all patches into a tree SGI can pull. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs