From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n029wiDc016600 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 03:58:44 -0600 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:58:42 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.29 Message-ID: <20090102095842.GA24652@infradead.org> References: <20081230030845.A4F0558AE206@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20090101170329.GA17892@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux Kernel Development , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:57:43AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hmm, can't reproduce it here with CONFIG_LBD=n on x86, but the following > > x86-32 or -64? > > It may also depend on the compiler version. I have gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 > (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21). 32 bit, gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs