From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n02HxCv1018581 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:59:13 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 026CD1BFA410 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:59:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 84kPTlsjFuVFFKPN for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:59:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:59:11 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: oopses in xfs_attr_shortform_* on kerneloops.org Message-ID: <20090102175911.GA29506@infradead.org> References: <495D91A0.4050304@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <495D91A0.4050304@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I noticed this on kerneloops.org and pinged Christoph about it but I'll > go ahead & point it out here & file a bug so it doesn't get lost: > > http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=xfs_attr_shortform&btnG=Function+Search > > would seem to indicate a problem, though not a (recent) regression anyway. Yeah, I've been looking into and the disassemly looks like we have a NULL attribut fork pointer for some reason. I did some poking around in the code and couldn't a cause for it. So if anyone of the kerneloops submitters actually is on the list and can reproduce it that would be extremly helpful. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs