From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n068MF0D030715 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:22:16 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7D105649AF for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rSncQGvyXB49xRmE for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:22:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 03:22:14 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] define xfs_ino_t as unsigned long long Message-ID: <20090106082214.GA635@infradead.org> References: <20090105193129.GA19909@infradead.org> <20090106011414.GB9448@disturbed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090106011414.GB9448@disturbed> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:14:14PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:31:29PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > That way we can avoid ugly casts when printining it (like the ones > > that show up on powerpc with Linus' current tree). > > Is that because ppc uses int-l64.h instead of int-64ll.h and so __64 gets > defined to an unsigned long on that platform? Yes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs