From: Roland Eggner <edvx1@systemanalysen.net>
To: SGI Project XFS mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs regression in linux_2.6.28, "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 3327 of file fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c"
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:08:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901161008.02387.edvx1@systemanalysen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090115221438.GF8071@disturbed>
On Thursday Jan 15th 2009 at 23:14:38 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:02:39AM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote:
> > Latest (so far) working linux_2.6.27.9
> > linux_2.6.28 seems to introduce a xfs regression:
>
> You mean 2.6.29, don't you (i.e. a current TOT development kernel,
> not a stable kernel)?
I meant exactly what I have written: linux_2.6.28
> We have received a few reports of that since 2.6.29-git2 after the
> big XFS merge occurred. Can you confirm that you are running a very
> recent unstable kernel and not a stable 2.6.28 kernel?
all 2.6.28 builds which I have tried so far are broken,
today tried linux_2.6.29-rc1 and got the same "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO .."
note: SAME failure with
linux_2.6.28
linux_2.6.28-git7
linux_2.6.28-git9
linux_2.6.29-rc1
Should I compile with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG?
If you know a 2.6.28 or 2.6.29 kernel with REALLY stable xfs:
please point me :-)
> BTW, I note your kernel is tainted (like a couple of other
> reports of this problem). Can you tell us what module you are
> running that taints the kernel so we can correlate that with
> other reports of the problem?
kernels vanilla from kernel.org
+ NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.09 graphics driver
+ from loop-aes-source the kernel-2.6.27 patch
+ following patch required because of the new credentials framework
--- drivers/block/loop.c.orig 2009-01-11 00:55:28.000000000 +0100
+++ drivers/block/loop.c 2009-01-11 01:07:44.525441742 +0100
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@
unsigned char b[64];
} un;
- if(lo->lo_key_owner != current->uid && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ if(lo->lo_key_owner != current_uid() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
m = (AESmultiKey *)lo->key_data;
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@
int err;
struct loop_func_table *xfer = NULL;
- if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size && lo->lo_key_owner != current->uid &&
+ if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size && lo->lo_key_owner != current_uid() &&
!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if ((unsigned int) info->lo_encrypt_key_size > LO_KEY_SIZE)
@@ -2416,7 +2416,7 @@
if (info->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
memcpy(lo->lo_encrypt_key, info->lo_encrypt_key,
info->lo_encrypt_key_size);
- lo->lo_key_owner = current->uid;
+ lo->lo_key_owner = current_uid();
}
lo->lo_queue->make_request_fn = loop_make_request_real;
I believe problem is xfs related, because only xfs partitions with write
activity are affected, and the first error line in kernel log was in EVERY case
"XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO ..". It seems that the loop module does not matter,
because both plane xfs partitions and encrypted xfs partitions are similarly
affected.
Cheers
Roland
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-15 3:02 xfs regression in linux_2.6.28, "XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO at line 3327 of file fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c" Roland Eggner
2009-01-15 22:14 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-16 9:08 ` Roland Eggner [this message]
2009-01-17 7:25 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-30 1:18 ` Roland Eggner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901161008.02387.edvx1@systemanalysen.net \
--to=edvx1@systemanalysen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox