From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n0K0kPC5002385 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:25 -0600 Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A51789FC88 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:46:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.57]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kXILt9pVYAEGcSbx for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:46:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:46:11 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO Message-ID: <20090120004611.GA6445@disturbed> References: <497468C1.3000001@gmail.com> <4974CA20.6050308@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4974CA20.6050308@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: hch@infradead.org, Jacek Luczak , LKML , xfs mailing list On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Jacek Luczak wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've stepped into XFS issue/bug. Yesterday I've compiled 2.6.29-rc2 and no > > didn't found errors. Today I've booted my notebook and XFS bug have occurred. > > System reboot didn't helped, same error appeared. > > > > Some info: > > [1] config: http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2.config > > [2] kernel logs: > > http://pin.if.uz.zgora.pl/~difrost/linux-next/2.6.29-rc2_XFS-bug.log > > [3] most interesting part of log below. > > so this happens every mount? Reproducible is good. How large is the > filesystem (too large to extract elsewhere for analysis...?) (plus I > suppose it'll be hard to get to it when you can't even boot....) XFS folks, I suspect the common link between all the reports of this bug is that they are on 32-bit kernels. I can't reproduce this on a 64 bit kernel, and I'm trying to get a 32-bit UML built right now to test this theory. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs