From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n0KKXNnB013693 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:33:24 -0600 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:33:19 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Message-ID: <20090120203319.GA7103@infradead.org> References: <20090110143924.GA25900@infradead.org> <20090110152803.GA7469@infradead.org> <20090110221459.GA8873@orion> <20090111104659.GB8071@disturbed> <20090112034550.GI8071@disturbed> <20090112211848.GL8071@disturbed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > Hi > > Is it a new bug? > It is pre-2.6.29-rc1 kernel, which was supossed to be free of the bug > "fs_is_ok, file: fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 3327" >>From the trace it's a post-btree consolidation kernel, so all the bugs in -rc1 are there, too. It looks like this is the readahead type cockup that Geert noticed, so this particular one should be fixed in -rc2. I would strongly recommend to just turn on CNFIG_LBD for post-2.6.28 kernels for now as all the problems showing up are without CONFIG_LBD. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs