public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:22:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090124032210.GA30366@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4423d670901231034k6971ed91tbed3d6eab05d7285@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:34:36PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> But I do not need LBD. Does XFS strongly require LBD?
> Should I always turn it on even if I do not have files or devices of size 2Tb+ ?

The bug is now fixed in the development tree, but until you upgrade
to a kernel with the fix enabling CONFIG_LBD will keep you from hitting
the bug.

As you unfortunately noticed the !CONFIG_LBD case doesn't really get
much test coverage, so I would personally recommend turning it on even
if you don't need it.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-24  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09  4:41 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-09  5:38 ` [xfs-masters] " Dave Chinner
2009-01-09 21:53   ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-09 22:18     ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-09 23:11       ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-10 12:19         ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-10 14:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-10 15:09             ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-10 15:28               ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-10 22:14                 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-11 10:46                   ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-12  0:48                     ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-12  2:19                       ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-12  3:45                       ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-12  8:08                         ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-12 21:18                           ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-20 18:54                             ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-20 19:33                               ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-20 20:33                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-23 18:34                                 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-01-24  3:22                                   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-01-10 16:27               ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090124032210.GA30366@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox