From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n0O5TgY6250349 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:29:43 -0600
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AF74C1BA8892
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NKM7IOqifZ3ZxLWc for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:28:59 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: update doc/CHANGES
Message-ID: <20090124052859.GA32606@infradead.org>
References: <20090123005648.GA3194@infradead.org>
	<1232774578.13684.5.camel@verge.scott.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1232774578.13684.5.camel@verge.scott.net.au>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Nathan Scott <nscott@aconex.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 04:22:58PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 19:56 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> > +	- Various xfs_quta fixes, thanks to Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
> 
> typo.
> 
> > +	- Addition of the xfs_fsr and xfs_estimate tools previous found
> > +	  in the xfsdump package
> 
> rpm magic is probably needed in build/rpm/rpm.spec.in to prevent
> old versions of xfsdump from being installed alongside the new
> xfsprogs ... else rpm will report file conflicts, I think?  Same
> will be needed in debian/control... hmm, both should be pretty
> easy - just change "Conflicts: xfsdump < 2.0.0" to "3.0.0" (and
> we should make xfsdump v3 at this time too, so its very clear).

Agreed.  I think it's better to leave the debian part to you, and
I'll look into the rpm part later.

Any chance you could also review the fsr and estimate manpage
patches as they should go in before this one?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs