From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0P51UC8094433 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:01:31 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D4EE11BAB008 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 12tomqzFBPOGosyV for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:00:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:00:46 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs spec file update Message-ID: <20090125050046.GB3979@infradead.org> References: <1232777667.13684.20.camel@verge.scott.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1232777667.13684.20.camel@verge.scott.net.au> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nathan Scott Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:14:27PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Since binaries have moved between xfsprogs and xfsdump packages > in version 3.0.0, we need to fix the dependencies in the rpm > specfiles, else rpm will complain. > > While in there, remove xfs-cmds Provides/Obsoletes lines, there > is no way anyone is ever going to be requiring those anymore (no > real-world upgrade path having such old skool SGI-released rpms). Looks good to me, even without any real uptodate rpm knowledge.. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs