From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0Q7uYes205582 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:56:35 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 889B1185ECA0 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id smLJ39zmcWA1NUBT for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LRMK0-0002ED-8N for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:55:52 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:55:52 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] xfs: cleanup handling in xfs_swap_extents Message-ID: <20090126075552.GA1062@infradead.org> References: <20090126073136.384490000@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090126073200.459094000@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090126073200.459094000@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:31:39AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Use multiple lables for proper error unwinding and get rid of some now > superflous variables. Sorry, should have been cleanup error handling and marked as beein from Jeff. Jeff, maybe you should just resend this yourself so that it doesn't get messed up? You can add my Tested-by flag as it passed xfsqa on multiple platforms for me (although with the recent swapext flaw I wonder if that actuall means anything :)) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs