From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n0RArtX2039909 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:53:55 -0600
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3FB4418670DE
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[140.211.169.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	c2ElUUWTAP4i24EC for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:41:30 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: new xfs git tree
Message-Id: <20090126224130.53949fda.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
References: <20090119011601.GA14708@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:01 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs.git has all the fixes the
> have been peer-reviewed by the usual crowd, but still waiting for
> a "maintainer" to respond..

Should we include that in linux-next?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs