From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0S8r9al112665 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:53:10 -0600 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 12C25C1D05 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id B3G0DtiAcG5VZfvY for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE412BDD for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E64540016C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:52:26 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: xfs open questions Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:52:13 +0100 References: <200901270928.29215@zmi.at> <200901280003.30518@zmi.at> <497FDC16.6050809@thebarn.com> In-Reply-To: <497FDC16.6050809@thebarn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200901280952.26027@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3462550104847019185==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============3462550104847019185== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4093208.jOfESyumJR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart4093208.jOfESyumJR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote: > The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow? > It might have something to do with the html stripper. Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with gpg- sigs in different colours to easily see if it's correct/trusted/wrong.=20 And on this list, my messages all come with "Invalid Sig". mfg zmi --=20 // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 --nextPart4093208.jOfESyumJR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmAHMkACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRPegCgocyE14L1DNfHCvAmdhslr/JN BdEAn0a2IFYSkJ1QnTm+roA/8Wvo41Nh =xRRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4093208.jOfESyumJR-- --===============3462550104847019185== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============3462550104847019185==--