From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0SKN4Bi150908 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:23:05 -0600 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3798E1880F63 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (mondschein.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qk0szb8VAnVcqBkj for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from shambhala.lichtvoll.home (DSL01.212.114.235.144.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [212.114.235.144]) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4F475AE91 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:21:44 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:22:00 +0100 References: <200901270928.29215@zmi.at> <4980712A.4050500@thebarn.com> <49807510.20100@thebarn.com> (sfid-20090128_201347_468687_E8D58AED) In-Reply-To: <49807510.20100@thebarn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200901282122.05588.Martin@lichtvoll.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2253445426859883053==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============2253445426859883053== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1489635.Dn0nRFu71v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1489635.Dn0nRFu71v Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 schrieb Russell Cattelan: > Russell Cattelan wrote: > > Michael Monnerie wrote: > >> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote: > >>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow? > >>> It might have something to do with the html stripper. > >> > >> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with > >> gpg- sigs in different colours to easily see if it's > >> correct/trusted/wrong. And on this list, my messages all come with > >> "Invalid Sig". > > > > Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems to > > work fine. > > > > Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come back > > to me with a valid sig. > > Grr try #2 Shown as invalid here - as the signature of Michael. I mentioned this a=20 few times already to. Signing this as well, but I expect it will come out as invalid too. I think it can't be Mailman. As I am on several Mailman mailinglist where=20 this works. =2D-=20 Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 --nextPart1489635.Dn0nRFu71v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmAvmgACgkQmRvqrKWZhMcOUQCffTezGqCe70i2DFFp+RB3cQvY SiIAn3apAobG8w1EZsU+R1syDnEzJOCn =8irw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1489635.Dn0nRFu71v-- --===============2253445426859883053== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============2253445426859883053==--