From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0SMjQFV157877 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:45:26 -0600 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6FEF6C6513 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (mondschein.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ompPuHbbd5KkpoiY for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:44:44 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:44:13 +0100 References: <200901270928.29215@zmi.at> <200901282122.05588.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20090128203703.GB3958@teal.hq.k1024.org> (sfid-20090128_220347_752737_13DDE9F8) In-Reply-To: <20090128203703.GB3958@teal.hq.k1024.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200901282344.32351.Martin@lichtvoll.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5533992459587848669==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Iustin Pop Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============5533992459587848669== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2191547.HZm374fvPe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2191547.HZm374fvPe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 schrieb Iustin Pop: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:22:00PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 schrieb Russell Cattelan: > > > Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > > Michael Monnerie wrote: > > > >> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > >>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow? > > > >>> It might have something to do with the html stripper. > > > >> > > > >> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails > > > >> with gpg- sigs in different colours to easily see if it's > > > >> correct/trusted/wrong. And on this list, my messages all come > > > >> with "Invalid Sig". > > > > > > > > Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems > > > > to work fine. > > > > > > > > Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come > > > > back to me with a valid sig. > > > > > > Grr try #2 > > > > Shown as invalid here - as the signature of Michael. I mentioned this > > a few times already to. > > > > Signing this as well, but I expect it will come out as invalid too. > > For what is worth, gpg tells me on your email: > > gpg: Signature made Wed 28 Jan 2009 09:22:00 PM CET using DSA key ID > A59984C7 gpg: Good signature from "Martin Steigerwald > " gpg: aka "Martin Steigerwald > " gpg: aka "Martin > Steigerwald (Helios) " gpg: aka > "Martin Steigerwald " > > So maybe it's not the mailling list itself, but something else? Strange. A bug in KMail with decoding GPG signaturesin *some* mails?=20 However I did find this only on the XFS mailing list so far. If I find=20 time I will take a closer look tomorrow. =2D-=20 Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 --nextPart2191547.HZm374fvPe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmA370ACgkQmRvqrKWZhMfLKgCgoulCy1lLcjYuYdKUL0Zob1se lW8AoKedJjwmLAerlTnrdmTWI2W2yAlP =J/Jp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2191547.HZm374fvPe-- --===============5533992459587848669== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============5533992459587848669==--