From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n0TI2RfF223711 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:02:27 -0600 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 40FBCC9C17 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kkiMPfhA3pScPOov for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BC02B35 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F00440016F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:43 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:42 +0100 References: <200901270928.29215@zmi.at> <20090128203703.GB3958@teal.hq.k1024.org> <200901282344.32351.Martin@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <200901282344.32351.Martin@lichtvoll.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901291901.42926@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Strange. A bug in KMail with decoding GPG signaturesin *some* mails? > However I did find this only on the XFS mailing list so far. If I > find time I will take a closer look tomorrow. Yes, I am in a lot of mailing lists, but only here I see "invalid" sigs. Russell: Your 1st mail with sig was valid, the 2nd not. Maybe Martin can find the culprit. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs