From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n136LHY0040831 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:21:18 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 69073DD7B7 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3fiTYPAyz6fj332B for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:20:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:20:36 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Fwd: Bug#513821: xfsprogs: xfs_growfs does not work] Message-ID: <20090203062036.GA23098@infradead.org> References: <1233641256.5518.83.camel@verge.scott.net.au> <1233641336.5518.85.camel@verge.scott.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1233641336.5518.85.camel@verge.scott.net.au> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nathan Scott Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:08:56PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:07 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Is this issue known (Eric?) in 2.10.2? > > and "Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)" to save ya looking. 2.6.16 didn't have the compat ioctl handler for growfs yet, and this is i386 xfsprogs on a 64bit kernel. He needs to upgrade to a more recent kernel. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs