public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_force_shutdown after Raid crash
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:22:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902050922.18307@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902041718.15836@zmi.at>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2170 bytes --]

On Mittwoch 04 Februar 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> >   - if a RAID controller does not turn off the disks write cache,
> > the controller cannot know if previous writes have made it to the
> > disk.
>
> The controller could keep in-transfer blocks in it's cache, waiting
> for a confirm from the disk that the blocks are on the media, and
> only afterwards remove it from cache. I don't know if controllers do
> that actually. I'll ask Areca support on that.

I have an answer from Areca support:
*******************************************************
as soon as the hard drive firmware response command completed, the data 
will be remove from controller cache. so controller will not known the 
data had been trully write into disks or remain in hard drive cache 
only.

by controller default setting, if controller have battery module 
connected, it will automatically disable the hard drive cache for best 
data protection. as you known, controller can't protect the data remain 
in hard drive cache while power outage occured.

but this setting is configure-able, some customer may forece enable the 
hard drive cacne for better performance. beucase hard drive without 
cache enabled have quite poor performance.
*******************************************************
So I'd say they have a very sensible default: 
If you use a BBM (battery backup module) then disk write caches will be 
off, because you care about your data. 
If you dont use a BBM anyway, they let disk write cache on because your 
data is not save at all, so why care? 8-) And as most magazines will 
test without a BBM, it improves speed up to the max, which is good for 
benchmarks :-)

I'll put a section with RAID controllers into the wiki, if someone has 
objections we can remove it again.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-30 21:53 xfs_force_shutdown after Raid crash Steffen Knauf
2009-01-31 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-03  1:22   ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-03  3:13     ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-03  9:22       ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-03  9:32         ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-03 10:40           ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-03 15:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-04  8:52               ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-04 10:27                 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-04 12:26                   ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-04 15:03                     ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-13 10:12                       ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-04 12:22                 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-04 12:45                   ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-02-04 14:01                     ` KELEMEN Peter
2009-02-04 15:15                       ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-02-04 15:25                         ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-04 15:41                         ` KELEMEN Peter
2009-02-04 16:01                           ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-04 16:23                           ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-02-04 15:24                   ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-05  8:37                     ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-04 15:33                   ` Ralf Liebenow
2009-02-04 16:18                     ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-05  8:22                       ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2009-02-05 12:05                         ` Emmanuel Florac
2009-02-06 15:57   ` Steffen Knauf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902050922.18307@zmi.at \
    --to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox