From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n167Hvk6006515 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:18:00 -0600 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 02:17:17 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] xfs: cleanup xfs_find_handle Message-ID: <20090206071717.GA3295@infradead.org> References: <20090126073136.384490000@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090126073202.277472000@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Blyakher Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:20:22PM -0600, Felix Blyakher wrote: > Do we want to verify here that cmd is either XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_FSHANDLE > or XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE ... It's called in a single place for just these three subcases, so having another verification here doesn't seem juseful. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs