From: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Andreas Grünbacher" <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] attr: test/ improvements and integrate with make
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:10:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090207091033.GO29636@jenkins.ifup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090108165820.GA3832@jenkins>
On 08:58 Thu 08 Jan 2009, Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 10:44 Thu 08 Jan 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:19:47PM -0800, brandon@ifup.org wrote:
> > > NOTE: Timothy Shimmin's email (tes@sgi.com) seems to be gone. Who should
> > > I send patches like this to in the future?
> >
> > That's not quite sorted out. For now send them to Andreas Gruenbacher
> > and the xfs list.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> Andreas, please review these patches if you can:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00136.html
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00146.html
I noticed that Christoph put acl-dev.git and attr-dev.git on
git.kernel.org. Great news! The process with CVS and TAKEs was a bit
confusing.
But, can I suggest that we merge the attr-dev and acl-dev tree into one
git repo and share libmisc? I have done it over here:
http://ifup.org/git/?p=acl-attr-dev.git;a=summary
git clone git://ifup.org/philips/acl-attr-dev.git
What do you think?
Also, my test/ patchset hasn't gotten any feedback. I will merge them
into either {acl,attr}-dev.git or my acl-attr-dev.git if they seem
acceptable and send you a pull request.
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-January/039600.html
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-January/039610.html
Cheers, Brandon
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-07 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 2:19 [patch 0/4] attr: test/ improvements and integrate with make brandon
2009-01-08 2:19 ` [patch 1/4] [PATCH] attr: move ext2/3 tests into seperate test file brandon
2009-01-08 2:19 ` [patch 2/4] [PATCH] attr: various improvements for test/run brandon
2009-01-08 2:19 ` [patch 3/4] [PATCH] attr: add make test target and use make to run tests brandon
2009-01-08 2:19 ` [patch 4/4] [PATCH] attr: Tests for path recursion with -L -P -R brandon
2009-01-08 15:44 ` [patch 0/4] attr: test/ improvements and integrate with make Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-08 16:58 ` Brandon Philips
2009-02-07 9:10 ` Brandon Philips [this message]
2009-02-08 22:59 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-02-08 23:38 ` Brandon Philips
2009-02-09 0:31 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-02-09 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-09 19:06 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2009-02-09 19:09 ` merging acl-dev and attr-dev [was: Re: [patch 0/4] attr: test/ improvements and integrate with make] Brandon Philips
2009-02-10 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090207091033.GO29636@jenkins.ifup.org \
--to=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox