From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n18MhReY199252 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:43:27 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B7F6AFBA60 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Oiuh3CmZiR1BgJVT for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:42:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4 Message-ID: <20090208224249.GA11931@infradead.org> References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@champagne.cantina> <20090208222859.GA2532@infradead.org> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@champagne.cantina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234132752.12370.0.camel@champagne.cantina> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alessandro Bono Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs , linux-kernel On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut > > > here ]------------ > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at > > > fs/buffer.c:470! > > > > Per > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d > > > > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code. > > > > What additional patches do you have applied? > > > > vanilla kernel > no additional patches at all Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there. Can you attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs