From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n18N1gfc200325 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:01:43 -0600 Received: from mx2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 143D918F00AC for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RJadhAz8DWqmNRww for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:01:03 -0800 (PST) From: Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] attr: test/ improvements and integrate with make Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:59:59 +0100 References: <20090108021947.404730068@ifup.org> <20090108165820.GA3832@jenkins> <20090207091033.GO29636@jenkins.ifup.org> In-Reply-To: <20090207091033.GO29636@jenkins.ifup.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902090000.00162.agruen@suse.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brandon Philips Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:10:33 Brandon Philips wrote: > On 08:58 Thu 08 Jan 2009, Brandon Philips wrote: > > On 10:44 Thu 08 Jan 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:19:47PM -0800, brandon@ifup.org wrote: > > > > NOTE: Timothy Shimmin's email (tes@sgi.com) seems to be gone. Who > > > > should I send patches like this to in the future? > > > > > > That's not quite sorted out. For now send them to Andreas Gruenbacher > > > and the xfs list. > > > > Ok, thanks. > > > > Andreas, please review these patches if you can: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00136.html > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00146.html > > I noticed that Christoph put acl-dev.git and attr-dev.git on > git.kernel.org. Great news! Yes, and the trees have nice histories as well, which is great. > But, can I suggest that we merge the attr-dev and acl-dev tree into one > git repo and share libmisc? I have done it over here: > > http://ifup.org/git/?p=acl-attr-dev.git;a=summary > git clone git://ifup.org/philips/acl-attr-dev.git > > What do you think? I believe it's a good start; we probably want to merge the trees eventually. The way how you have moved libmisc breaks the tarballs though; I have fixed it. Also, I was surprised that your repository has all the history rewritten instead of merging Christoph's trees, so I redid the merge. http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/xattr-tools.git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agruen/xattr-tools.git Are you fine with this tree? > Also, my test/ patchset hasn't gotten any feedback. I will merge them > into either {acl,attr}-dev.git or my acl-attr-dev.git if they seem > acceptable and send you a pull request. > > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-January/039600.html > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-January/039610.html Sorry for being slow. I will first add the other acked distro patches, then look at your changes. Andreas _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs