public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: xfs preallocation timeout
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:22:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902111522.11987@zmi.at> (raw)

Does /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs influence the maximum time XFS 
takes before the "in-memory but not on disk" preallocation actually 
starts writing to disk? If not, which parameter does influence how long 
files are grouped together in memory before writing them really to disk? 
The longer the better for performance, but more risk for data loss of 
course. 

I ask this because I want to know when copying files over the net to an 
XFS drive, how I can prevent fragmentation to occur. Example: If a 
packet of 1024 Bytes arrives every 1/100th second, it needs 0.64s to get 
64KB of data, 1.28s to get 128KB. If the prealloc timeout is one second, 
it's effectively not used in this case. So if you got a server where you 
know files arrive at a certain speed, fine tuning this prealloc timeout 
could help prevent fragmentation.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4










_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 14:22 Michael Monnerie [this message]
2009-02-12 22:08 ` xfs preallocation timeout Dave Chinner
2009-02-13  9:35   ` Michael Monnerie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902111522.11987@zmi.at \
    --to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox