From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add version 3 inode format with CRCs
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:38:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212063836.GB824@josefsipek.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090210202941.455393000@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 03:22:53PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
...
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h 2009-02-10 19:45:51.939069576 +0100
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h 2009-02-10 19:45:59.195068745 +0100
> @@ -69,11 +69,32 @@ typedef struct xfs_dinode {
>
> /* di_next_unlinked is the only non-core field in the old dinode */
> __be32 di_next_unlinked;/* agi unlinked list ptr */
> -} __attribute__((packed)) xfs_dinode_t;
> +
> + /* start of the extended dinode, writable fields */
> + __be32 di_crc; /* CRC of the inode */
> + __be64 di_changecount; /* number of attribute changes */
> + __u8 di_pad2[16]; /* more padding for future expansion */
> +
> + /* fields only written to during inode creation */
> + xfs_timestamp_t di_crtime; /* time created */
> + __be64 di_ino; /* inode number */
> + uuid_t di_uuid; /* UUID of the filesystem */
> +} xfs_dinode_t;
Hrm...removing the packed attribute... Eric, do you remember the ARM ABI
alignment rules? Regardless of ARM, are those fields aligned nicely? (From a
quick glance at the code looks ok.)
Also, why is the padding filed in the middle of these fields? IOW, why are
crtime/ino/uuid at the end?
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
Bad pun of the week: The formula 1 control computer suffered from a race
condition
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 20:22 [PATCH 00/13] Updated CRC patches Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: cleanup xlog_bread Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: remove m_litino Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: remove m_attroffset Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: take inode version into account in XFS_LITINO Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add CRC infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-12 6:10 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: add support for large btree blocks Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the superblock Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGF Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGI Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGFL Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-11 7:54 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-15 18:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: add CRC checks to the log Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add version 3 inode format with CRCs Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-12 6:38 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [this message]
2009-02-12 18:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-12 18:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-10 20:22 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: add CRC checks for quota blocks Christoph Hellwig
2009-02-12 6:41 ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-02-13 20:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212063836.GB824@josefsipek.net \
--to=jeffpc@josefsipek.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox