From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1FHOrZE084744 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:24:54 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7022D194023F for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:24:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CuBHoFS2Nj7WKKYm for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:24:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:24:17 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: rfc 1/2: specfile: use rpm macros where possible Message-ID: <20090215172417.GA20256@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Thanks, I'll put these in. Can you submit equivalent patches for xfsdump and dmapi, too? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs