From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1FJGmXS090979 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:16:49 -0600 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:16:14 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix off by one error in page_region_mask() Message-ID: <20090215191614.GA862@infradead.org> References: <49378B60.1060603@sgi.com> <20081222085354.GC24795@infradead.org> <49502F91.4050406@sgi.com> <49742371.2000806@sgi.com> <20090122222539.GA9643@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090122222539.GA9643@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-oss On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:25:39PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 05:53:37PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > >> Did you guys come to a conclusion in your discussions? > > >> > > > No conclusion, well nothing that resulted in an ack. > > > > Was anyone okay with this fix? > > I think it's okay to go. It fixes the one off so it's go. > > The code is still a very hard to understand mess, but that's not what > the patch was supposed to fix.. Any reason this isn't in yet? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs