From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1FKD5u9093934 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:13:06 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AD846122DA9 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:12:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id KYeheMNzT8oie8EA for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:12:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:12:00 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent lookup from finding bad buffers Message-ID: <20090215201200.GB12161@infradead.org> References: <4990EAF9.9010607@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4990EAF9.9010607@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:48:25PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > There's a bug in _xfs_buf_find() that will cause it to return buffers > that failed to be initialised. Is there a testcase for this? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs