From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1FKMUMl094866 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:22:30 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 85F031230C8 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rXX8GD0tllxrkeDY for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LYnUT-0005DE-Pa for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:21:25 +0000 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:21:25 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: tarballs generated by Makepkgs Message-ID: <20090215202125.GA18218@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com currently Makepkgs generats the source tarball as package-version.src.tar.gz, which is not what we used for recent releases and not what most other open source packages do. I'd like to change it to package-version.tar.gz, but that currently collides with the binary tar packages. Does anyone still need those binary tar packages? If yes we should rename them, too or otherwise just remove them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs