From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1JJODZP124536 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:24:13 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 171A3196AD4A for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZVHOMx0EyUyGHhLd for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:23:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:23:40 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH, needs a new owner] XFS multi-buftarg Message-ID: <20090219192340.GA13964@infradead.org> References: <4993A012.5060008@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4993A012.5060008@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:05:38PM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: > > Series of 10 patches, originally by Dave Chinner. This series > is unfinished, or needs forward porting to top-of-tree at the > very least. The feature implements some allocator/layout optimizations > by grouping AGs based on concat units, I think ;-) > > 02/10 xfs-factor-pag-freelist-check-2 This one is an independent cleanup. It looks good to me and passes XFSQA. Dave, can you submit this one for 2.6.30? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs