* xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump @ 2009-02-24 1:04 Mike Frysinger 2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-24 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xfs-oss [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --] both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and xfs_fsr. shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ? -mike [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump 2009-02-24 1:04 xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen 2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-02-24 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: xfs-oss On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and > xfs_fsr. > shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ? > -mike > They should have been moved to xfsprogs in the latest releases of each.. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump 2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-24 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --] On Monday 23 February 2009 20:38:48 Eric Sandeen wrote: > On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and > > xfs_fsr. shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ? > > They should have been moved to xfsprogs in the latest releases of each.. blah, you're right of course. i thought i was looking at xfsdump-3, but apparently not. -mike [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-24 3:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-02-24 1:04 xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump Mike Frysinger 2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen 2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox