* xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump
@ 2009-02-24 1:04 Mike Frysinger
2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-24 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]
both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and xfs_fsr.
shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ?
-mike
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump
2009-02-24 1:04 xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump Mike Frysinger
@ 2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-02-24 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: xfs-oss
On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and
> xfs_fsr.
> shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ?
> -mike
>
They should have been moved to xfsprogs in the latest releases of each..
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump
2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-02-24 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --]
On Monday 23 February 2009 20:38:48 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > both the xfsprogs and xfsdump package provide xfs_estimate and
> > xfs_fsr. shouldnt only one of these packages be providing them ?
>
> They should have been moved to xfsprogs in the latest releases of each..
blah, you're right of course. i thought i was looking at xfsdump-3, but
apparently not.
-mike
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-24 3:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-24 1:04 xfs_estimate/xfs_fsr: xfsprogs or xfsdump Mike Frysinger
2009-02-24 1:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-24 3:47 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox