From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1ODKZeC144322 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:20:36 -0600 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:20:04 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfsprogs/xfsdump release process Message-ID: <20090224132003.GC1579@infradead.org> References: <200902221348.51905.vapier@gentoo.org> <20090223072207.GA4112@infradead.org> <200902231125.44076.vapier@gentoo.org> <49A2F933.3090308@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49A2F933.3090308@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mike Frysinger , xfs-oss On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:29:55PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Just FWIW, Fedora does similar. Changing md5sums on a released, > versioned tarball could set off all sorts of worries for distributions, > in general... Yeah. Guys, what about declaring the 3.0.0 releases officially botched and get 3.0.1 out next week? That should include all the small fixes we have out now and whatever small stuff comes up from distros trying to use it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs