From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n1PBqTl6202999 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:52:30 -0600 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D68D019A7216 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HFjhbe8E16jHNkDB for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCB442BE for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv2.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BF8F400174 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:24 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: xfs_force_shutdown called from file fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:23 +0100 References: <1235480661.17293.28.camel@disciplina.fs3.ph> <20090224224636.GF26138@disturbed> <1235556051.17569.4.camel@disciplina.fs3.ph> In-Reply-To: <1235556051.17569.4.camel@disciplina.fs3.ph> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902251251.23675@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mittwoch 25 Februar 2009 Federico Sevilla III wrote: > What would be the "community endorsed" approach to using our favorite > file system on CentOS 5? Would you recommend we go with the > CentOSPlus kernels instead? We run openSUSE, but many servers with a vanilla kernel. So you can upgrade whenever you like. Currently, 2.6.28.x is the newest version. Problem could be that CentOS relies on a patched kernel in some place (I don't use it so don't know), but if that doesn't hit you, it doesn't matter. For example, openSUSE kernels support a nice graphical boot instead of the text, but we don't need that. You must also take care of kernel bugs and updates yourself from the moment you use your own compiled kernel. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs